The same 6 errors when using winter tyres of the car

The same 6 errors when using winter tyres of the car
Error of N1.
Use of winter tyres justifiablly even on one axis. It is often meeting mistake in the middle of car owners. Such makary on "Zhiguli" discrepancy of passableness and a troganiye from a place is solved only. In that complete set of "classic" will badly turn and brake – face-to-face wheels remain "slippery", and after all specifically the front provides braking and maneuverability. But the most awful occurs, when owners of front-wheel drive vehicles save up on winter tyres. It would seem, installation of such wheels all difficulties of passableness, start, braking and maneuverability ahead are solved – after all all this is provided by face-to-face driving wheels. The feeling of calmness and permissiveness comes. And then there is an awful. On one of slippery turns the back axis suddenly breaks in drift, and poslushlivy till this moment the car is suddenly developed by the back forward and takes off after the journey. The unique exit from this situation – to add gas to take out the car from drift. But it is very difficult morally (action to unnaturally usual human reactions, very much hunting gas to throw off or brake), well and places for such actions on the road usually do not suffice. Do not save up on winter tyres, in particular on a face-to-face drive – such economy will backfire. Put winter tyres on all four wheels!

Error of N2.
The thorn works only at a pure, artificial ice in width more than 1 mm. Again error of nezapyatanny water. The thorn works always – both at snow, and on any ice, even very narrow. And even on damp, with a sheet of water from above. However, its efficiency in the latter case very much falls. But not very well what, even the most excellent tyre without thorns in that situation behaves much more awfully!

Error of N3.
On pure asphalt thorns are rebated. Yes, but it is exclusive in those tyres which are not provided for a shipovka. By the way, at us on sale it is possible to meet with thorns even "vsesezonka" of Bl-85 – similar shipovanny tyres will suffice absolutely for short term. In not bad a protector (its sketch, cutting), the composition of rubber and thorns are picked up such makary that everything wore out at once. At all this the size of a vystupaniye of a thorn over a surface of a tyre remains to a constant. By the way, it is not absolutely correct to say that the brake way on asphalt thanks to thorns will increase. Truly, can increase if to brake "yuzy". But if on ice it is necessary to brake not "in a floor", on asphalt for what so to do?

Error of N4.
Loss of 2-3 thorns leads to an imbalance. This assumption is applicable only to tyres, shipovanny casual thorns. The firm automobile thorn now weighs in borders of the 1st gramme so loss even will lead the 3rd adjoining to an imbalance less than in three grammes.
Error of N5.
On the slippery road it is necessary to lower pressure in tyres. That leads absolutely incorrect acts because at all this the area of a spot of contact of the tyre from darling increases to fall of specific pressure. Finally coupling of the tyre with the slippery road will worsen.

Error of N6.
Interrupting braking reduces a brake way. To chagrin, in the middle of car owners there is a similar outlook. And again it is error! The brake way "yuzy" on the slippery road always is less, than at interrupting braking. Who does not believe, can check itself. Not enough that is a difference in brake ways ("yuzy" and falteringly) at slippery tyres will be more than at not bad winter. The matter is that after brake forces cease to affect the blocked wheel, it needs to be untwisted, and on ice it is simpler to it to slide and be hooked for promotion there is nothing. The most effective braking – on the verge of blocking (even according to the theory – with 15 %-a ny proskalzyvaniye). But to take control of such method of braking it is very difficult. Besides it is impossible to achieve from all "private traders" of ability of jeweller work as a foot. Here also there is on the 1st plan such concept, as convenience of braking, an informativnost of behaviour of the tyre when braking. One breaks in "юз" sharply, another will provide typical prompting jump of effort to pedals of a brake before being blocked even on ice.
Let’s put end.
Shipovannye tyres have advantage before neshipovanny on a brake way on ice from 20 to 50 %, on snow – from 5 to 10, on asphalt it increases on size to 5 %, thus if to brake "yuzy". At start and dispersal on ice win to 30 %, on snow – to 10. What after all to prefer? It is thought that a question: "How to go: with thorns or without?" – it is similar gamletovsky. Everyone should answer it itself. Besides any tyres – both with thorns, and without them – can be bad and quite good. And in certain situations excellent neshipovanny tyres probably will appear better than the bad shipovanny. And still it is necessary to hold in the head, what even the most mean shipovanny tyre has the smallest brake way, than the same neshipovanny. It means that in a critical situation on the road with snow and ice the car on them will stop on some metres earlier, than on the neshipovanny. The same two-three metres which often does not suffice in emergencies. With thorns it is possible to go everywhere not натуживаясь. Only do not think, what even on most not bad shipovanny tyres the car will behave, as in the summer on dry, pure asphalt! So let everyone solves itself: "With thorns or without?".

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>